top of page


Nigerians Contemplate NOT Doing Business With Nations That Disrespect Their Visa! But the real question is historically why are black and brown people with Passports/ Visas feared? A changing climate presents significant challenges, especially against a backdrop of fractured governance and an already vulnerable economy and as much as Europe wants to stay in Africa, they don't want the Africans! ( Mzungu is a southern, central and eastern African term for a person of foreign descent. Literally translated it means “someone who Wanders, Seemingly Homeless )

In line with the techniques used by classic horror writers—such as noted 1920s racist H.P. Lovecraft—white journalists often referenced unnamable evils in regards to traditional African spirituality. The New York Evening Post, for example, insisted that printed accounts were “tame compared to their horrible midnight orgies which the white man is not allowed to witness.”

The Nigerian government has said it considers it disrespectful to the Sovereignty of the country for any outside country to apply punitive measures such as visas restriction on its citizens. “It would be considered disrespectful of the sovereignty of Nigeria for any outside authority to sit in judgment over the conduct of our citizens and apply punitive measures such as visa restriction, unilaterally."

The most recent exports from Nigeria are led by Crude Petroleum ($52.1B), Petroleum Gas ($9.04B), Nitrogenous Fertilizers ($2B), Refined Petroleum ($1.04B), and Gold ($806M). The most common destination for the exports of Nigeria are Spain ($9.41B), India ($8.2B), France ($4.95B), United States ($4.83B), and Netherlands ($4.23B).

All of these nations have poor attitudes toward Nigerian citizens and other Africans based on an historical legacy to make Africans appear to be either the villains of the world or the cursed. These nations should pay extra for the resources they crave just for the insults they give Nigerian citizens with their visa policies! In the case of Spain if you hold a Nigerian passport, having a Spain Schengen Visa is a requirement prior to your travel plans In most cases, you will be informed within 15 calendar days whether your application has been successful. Sometimes it can take up to 45 days in case it is necessary to make a more detailed exam of the application. Spain has been a part of what the Ukrainian president calls a "White Schengen" nation since 1995 and operates similar immigration policies to 25 other countries in the union. Only Schengen citizens can enter Spain without a visa, and since Nigeria is not a Schengen country, visitors from Nigeria must get a visa before they are allowed into Spain.

"The signing of a visa-free agreement with the Schengen zone countries opens up new possibilities for us in terms of the so called white Schengen list featuring 57 countries, from Korea, Mexico and Uruguay, the Caribbean islands, which demand visas, to many other countries' President Poroshenko of Ukraine

Europe and other predominantly white nations feel the necessity to make sure melanated people are not staying to long in their nations because of their difficulty in maintaining their numbers due to recessive genetics. Currently all 29 Schengen States apply the same visa rules. The role of the European Commission is to develop, monitor and implement the EU common visa policy, regulating which non-EU nationals (Non Europeans BIPOC) need a visa to enter the Schengen Area for short stays of a maximum of 90 days in any 180-day period. When someone enters the Schengen Area, the 180-day period starts. This means that someone can enter the Schengen Area as many times as they want, but only stay for a total of 90 days, every 180 days. Visas for stays exceeding 90 days remain subject to national procedures. A Schengen visa is generally valid for every state of the Schengen Area.

Ironically although this keeps the European Union majority white because of Climate change the populations for these nations continues to drop exponentially! Every year faster and faster the decline in European populations continues.

European countries have a low fertility rate caused by climate and pollution which creates an ageing declining population. Western European countries make up for this by Immigration of BIPOC people. Europeans’ prevalence among U.S. immigrants began to wane in the second half of the 20th century. Significant changes in U.S. immigration policy in 1965 opened pathways for non-European immigrants specifically Asians, North Africans and Central Americans! The Black led Civil Rights Movement abolished the national origin quota system, under which immigrants were chosen on the basis of their race and ancestry.

Economic opportunities in post-World War II Western Europe made emigration less attractive, and Communist governments in most Eastern Europe countries erected barriers to emigration, all of which led to a significant drop in both the numbers and share of European immigrants in the United States. Whereas in 1960 Europeans constituted 75 percent of all U.S. immigrants, their share had fallen to 9 percent by 2020.

The US is currently attempting to bolster that number by allowing free access to immigrants that will be assigned new racial assignations if their phenotype is acceptably pheomelanin dominant! The definition of "white" has changed over time, but historians say it has always influenced immigration policy in the United States. This will only work if phenotypical African, East Indian and other Eumelanated populations are halted from entrance into the country thus the attack on Haitian immigrants while Venezuelan immigrants are allowed to break laws without serious repercussions. Rome tried this with the Visigoths...result? No more Rome!

If the USA had not allowed people of mixed and non European descent, to be considered White Americans (also referred to as European Americans and Caucasian Americans), they would not constitute the majority of the 331 million people living in the United States, with 191,697,647 people or 57.8% instead by 1940's law they would only be 35% in number! between 1878 and 1952, there were at least fifty-two court cases in the United States that tried to define who was white. Syrians became white in 1909,Irish, Italians, Greeks, Irish, Armenians, Spanish, Arabs, Slavs (Poles, Czechs, Yugoslavian etc) all became white by court cases.

But being Caucasian per se wasn’t necessarily enough to be white, either, as Bhagat Singh Thind discovered in 1923. Thind was an India-born Sikh who served in the U.S. Army during World War I; he claimed Aryan descent, meaning membership in the Caucasian race. The Supreme Court abandoned the supposedly scientific arguments it had used just a year earlier to define whiteness and ruled him ineligible for whiteness and therefore citizenship. It was common sense to a majority of justices that a “heathen” couldn’t be white. Basically you have to give up your culture and religion as well as lighten up the complexion of your descendants!

Armenians, for instance, were declared white in U.S. v. Cartozian (1925), based on several factors. Their Christianity became “a proxy for racial belonging.” An expert witness for the court personally knew of “ten or fifteen Armenians in Boston who had married American wives.” So worshiping in a Christian church and marrying white people were signifiers of being white.

Meanwhile divide and conquer tactics were used against the black community just as they did in Africa. Divisions in age, race, colorism, religion, ethnicity, tribalism all were exploited to allow Europeans to keep the upper hand against a larger population in the US the census consistently lied and continues to do so about the size of the black population for over 200 years! Claiming that the black population has been consistently 13 percent of the population for over 200 years is a statistic impossibility! In Africa beginning about 1880, Catholic missionaries the spy units of European colonization arrived in the Great Lakes region. Later, when German forces occupied the area during World War I, the conflict and efforts for Catholic conversion became more pronounced. As the Tutsi resisted conversion, the missionaries found success only among the Hutu. In an effort to reward conversion, the colonial government confiscated traditionally Tutsi land and reassigned it to Hutu tribes, igniting a conflict that has lasted into the 21st century.


"Yes. but their role will diminish as their population diminishes due to climate influenced demographic losses and the youth movement of Africa the old puppet leadership cronies who cowardly bowed down to the west and sold out their people will be seeing the ancestors soon and have to explain to them their actions!" (Black Mossad Min. of Information DW post.)

Apartheid South Africa looked after white people and nobody else. Now some of its white communities face a level of self inflicted deprivation, which threatens their future in the country.

Everyone here, regardless of color, tells you that the white elite are still riding high. Yet the poor whites just like in the USA and across Europe only have their proximity to the myth of white superiority to cling to and that is swiftly crumbling as they see a global decline in numbers with no end in sight. In African countries they no longer run the economies as the overt racism of Donald Trump and other world leaders have made the youth of Africa seek the diaspora for an understanding of what is going on.. Although foreign powers still have a disproportionate amount of influence in politics and the African media and they still have the best houses and most of the best jobs. All of this is true but it is not the only picture.

Look below the surface and you will find blacks escaping poverty forming entrepreneurial endeavors despite governmental lack of support and partnering with diasporans for capital to build the necessary infrastructures their national leaders long ago sold to foreign interests. Whites in Africa now have a sense of growing vulnerability they are seeking a white savior now that the religion of whiteness is faltering. So the question actually should be when it comes to Africa is, "whether white people who refuse to give up the concept of white supremacy genuinely have a future in the Motherland?" Hmmm?...and that answer is NO!


Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page